Operators often spend millions on network expansion, whether fibre, 5G, transport or other network types. But without a controlled rollout process, delivery times can degrade quickly, budgets escalate and the final network inventory may still be incomplete, inaccurate or out of date before the first service is activated.
In wholesale telecoms, growth should mean more revenue, more strategic customers and more network value - but for many wholesale operators it also means more fulfilment friction and more headaches. A single order can touch fibres, ports, leased infrastructure, field tasks and SLA commitments, yet many operators still try to manage that complexity across disconnected teams and tools (spreadsheets even). The real problem is the gap between what sales commits to and what the network can actually deliver on time, on budget and at the expected quality.
Telecom engineers regularly talk about outside plant (OSP) and inside plant infrastructure (ISP - no, not Internet Service Providers). But some OSS teams still struggle to clearly separate the two. The demarcation is much clearer in some carriers than others, especially when there is structural separation between OSP and ISP teams, systems and processes.
This article provides examples of network infrastructure, to categorise how operators describe, model and manage their infrastructure.
Every telecom operator talks about network transformation and network automation. Annual reports for telcos globally emphasise billions being invested in growing, maintaining, managing and evolving their networks. That makes sense. Telecommunications companies are known as network operators. But network builds only happen when customers and associated revenues justify the investment.
Have you ever wondered why operational support systems (OSS) not only remain relevant in a modern telco, but are even more important now than ever? Clearly, a modern telecommunications operator is no longer defined solely by its ability to deliver voice and basic connectivity services for customers. Today’s telcos operate far more complex and dynamic networks.
Telecom leaders naturally push for increased revenues and business growth. It’s easy to assume that this means launching more products and offers as well as chasing faster, automated provisioning. However, there’s something worth fixing first. Typically 5-10% of service orders still fall out and require manual intervention, clogging up the system and increasing customer dissatisfaction. The real impacts of poor order management on telecoms are rising OPEX, delayed revenue and churn risk.
Telecom network operators invest billions in building their networks and accelerating network rollout cycles. Unfortunately, there are often significant losses of time and money due to outdated processes, systems and data. However, forward-thinking operators aren’t blindly allocating ever greater OPEX funds to fix the problem. They’re deploying clever technologies that cut weeks from every project.
Network deployment isn’t getting cheaper, which has a direct impact on CAPEX budgets set months ago. However, smarter planning is making some operators far more efficient. Operators using automated design tools are reducing planning effort by up to 70%, before any cable plant even hits the ground. This article focuses on reducing telecom infrastructure costs through data-driven OSP (outside plant) design.
Page 1 of 12
